Sneaker influencer Nick Tuinenburg sold knockoff Nikes on Discord and launched his own Dunk lookalikes. A federal jury just hit him with $11 million in damages. The case is a warning to every brand founder who thinks copying a silhouette without the logo keeps them safe.
Read the full post →
A jury in rural Ohio just handed Afroman a full defense verdict after seven sheriff's deputies sued him for turning footage of their botched raid into an album's worth of diss tracks. The trial featured a deputy who couldn't confirm whether Afroman's claim of sleeping with his wife was actually fals
Read the full post →
Under U.S. copyright law, the photographer who takes a picture owns it — not the person in it. Cardi B is learning that the hard way.
Read the full post →
California's AB 2013 survived xAI's legal challenge. AI companies must now disclose their training data. What they reveal could expose a copyright liability the industry has been betting against for years.
Read the full post →
Nineteen of the 137 Venezuelans whom the Trump administration deported to El Salvador's CECOT megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act — the same men the government called terrorists, gang members, and enemies of the state — are now asking to be flown back to the United States to challenge those desig
Read the full post →
The Department of War designated Anthropic — an American AI company — a "supply chain risk to national security," a label previously reserved for foreign adversaries like Huawei and ZTE. The reason? Anthropic won't remove two contract provisions: no mass domestic surveillance, and no autonomous weap
Read the full post →
Judge Cannon permanently bars the DOJ from releasing Volume II of the Smith report. The motions were "unopposed" because no one was permitted to oppose them.
Read the full post →
Blake Lively's company is using a trademark opposition to block a Utah entrepreneur from registering BEAUTY BY BLAKE. It's a smart strategy. It's also a legally questionable one.
Read the full post →
Can They Just Backfill With Other Statutes? Technically, yes. Practically? Good luck. The President still has tariff authority under Section 232 and Section 301 — but those statutes require actual investigations, actual findings, and actual legal justification. You can't use a Section 301 finding ab
Read the full post →
The 1972 Coca-Cola v. Gemini Rising case shows how trademark parody can cause illegal consumer confusion.
Read the full post →
Trump's DOJ drops appeal of court order blocking massive UCLA settlement that would have banned diversity programs and declared transgender people don't exist.
Read the full post →
The TTAB ruled that PISSTERINE mouthwash would confuse consumers with LISTERINE, rejecting parody as a defense to trademark infringement.
Read the full post →
New Atlantic profile reveals Pam Bondi's pattern of calling reporters while crying to pressure them not to publish critical stories during her campaign.
Read the full post →
...a government attorney trying to punish a Senator for saying something as simple as "don't break the law" it apparently comes off to a grand jury less like a request to indict a ham sandwich and more like the rantings of an Arby's School of Law drop out.
Read the full post →
Welcome to another edition of Legalish. First, as always, hit the subscribe button if you haven't already. It's important to Legalish that every legal subscribe button is counted.
Today is November 9, 2020. And Joe Biden is the projected winner of the election for President of the United States. The announcement came while the legal team
Read the full post →